| Abstract |
Language ability is inherent (a priori) whereas researching the art of writing is acquired (posteriori). The former implies a compliant sequence in terms of creation (i.e. writing); therefore, it presents a logic of “unitary (zero), binary, and multiple” structures. The latter implies a reverse sequence in terms of criticism (i.e. reading), so that it presents a logic of “multiple, binary, and unitary (zero)” structures. Language ability involves “the generic ability”, “the specific ability”, and “the complex ability” (combination). Researching the art of writing, on the other hand, involves the ability to identify image (the narrow sense), vocabulary, rhetoric, grammar/syntax, organization, motif, and style. Language ability employs the compliant sequence to create images from meanings (i.e. the writing skill). Researching the art of writing put emphasis on the reverse sequence to capture meanings from images (i.e. the reading skill). Our thinking ability to “picture, logicize, and combine” meanings with images enables us to connect the inherent ability to the acquired research. In so doing, the inherent ability can be acknowledged. The outcome of the acquired research, in turn, can also link with the inherent ability and regress to the origin of life. Finally, the both are relative in the compliant/reverse sequence and integrated into “multiple”, “binary”, and “unitary (zero)” spiral structures.
|
